? GR0V Shell

GR0V shell

Linux www.koreapackagetour.com 2.6.32-042stab145.3 #1 SMP Thu Jun 11 14:05:04 MSK 2020 x86_64

Path : /home/admin/domains/happytokorea.net/public_html/yrfd5i8s/cache/
File Upload :
Current File : /home/admin/domains/happytokorea.net/public_html/yrfd5i8s/cache/f53b888d2a6bdc0d54926ea45ea686d3

a:5:{s:8:"template";s:15628:"<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="utf-8"/>
<meta content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0, maximum-scale=1.0, user-scalable=no" name="viewport"/>
<title>{{ keyword }}</title>
<link href="https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Lato%3A100%2C300%2C400%2C700%2C900%2C100italic%2C300italic%2C400italic%2C700italic%2C900italic%7CPoppins%3A100%2C200%2C300%2C400%2C500%2C600%2C700%2C800%2C900%2C100italic%2C200italic%2C300italic%2C400italic%2C500italic%2C600italic%2C700italic%2C800italic%2C900italic&amp;ver=1561768425" id="redux-google-fonts-woodmart_options-css" media="all" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"/>
<style rel="stylesheet" type="text/css">
@charset "utf-8";.has-drop-cap:not(:focus):first-letter{float:left;font-size:8.4em;line-height:.68;font-weight:100;margin:.05em .1em 0 0;text-transform:uppercase;font-style:normal}.wc-block-product-categories__button:not(:disabled):not([aria-disabled=true]):hover{background-color:#fff;color:#191e23;box-shadow:inset 0 0 0 1px #e2e4e7,inset 0 0 0 2px #fff,0 1px 1px rgba(25,30,35,.2)}.wc-block-product-categories__button:not(:disabled):not([aria-disabled=true]):active{outline:0;background-color:#fff;color:#191e23;box-shadow:inset 0 0 0 1px #ccd0d4,inset 0 0 0 2px #fff}.wc-block-product-search .wc-block-product-search__button:not(:disabled):not([aria-disabled=true]):hover{background-color:#fff;color:#191e23;box-shadow:inset 0 0 0 1px #e2e4e7,inset 0 0 0 2px #fff,0 1px 1px rgba(25,30,35,.2)}.wc-block-product-search .wc-block-product-search__button:not(:disabled):not([aria-disabled=true]):active{outline:0;background-color:#fff;color:#191e23;box-shadow:inset 0 0 0 1px #ccd0d4,inset 0 0 0 2px #fff}  
@font-face{font-family:Poppins;font-style:normal;font-weight:300;src:local('Poppins Light'),local('Poppins-Light'),url(https://fonts.gstatic.com/s/poppins/v9/pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf) format('truetype')}@font-face{font-family:Poppins;font-style:normal;font-weight:400;src:local('Poppins Regular'),local('Poppins-Regular'),url(https://fonts.gstatic.com/s/poppins/v9/pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf) format('truetype')}@font-face{font-family:Poppins;font-style:normal;font-weight:500;src:local('Poppins Medium'),local('Poppins-Medium'),url(https://fonts.gstatic.com/s/poppins/v9/pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf) format('truetype')} 
@-ms-viewport{width:device-width}html{box-sizing:border-box;-ms-overflow-style:scrollbar}*,::after,::before{box-sizing:inherit}.container{width:100%;padding-right:15px;padding-left:15px;margin-right:auto;margin-left:auto}@media (min-width:576px){.container{max-width:100%}}@media (min-width:769px){.container{max-width:100%}}@media (min-width:1025px){.container{max-width:100%}}@media (min-width:1200px){.container{max-width:1222px}}.row{display:-ms-flexbox;display:flex;-ms-flex-wrap:wrap;flex-wrap:wrap;margin-right:-15px;margin-left:-15px}a,body,div,footer,h1,header,html,i,li,span,ul{margin:0;padding:0;border:0;font:inherit;font-size:100%;vertical-align:baseline}*{-webkit-box-sizing:border-box;box-sizing:border-box}:after,:before{-webkit-box-sizing:border-box;box-sizing:border-box}html{line-height:1}ul{list-style:none}footer,header{display:block}a{-ms-touch-action:manipulation;touch-action:manipulation} html{font-family:sans-serif;-ms-text-size-adjust:100%;-webkit-text-size-adjust:100%;-webkit-tap-highlight-color:transparent}body{overflow-x:hidden;margin:0;line-height:1.6;font-size:14px;-webkit-font-smoothing:antialiased;-moz-osx-font-smoothing:grayscale;text-rendering:optimizeLegibility;color:#777;background-color:#fff}a{color:#3f3f3f;text-decoration:none;-webkit-transition:all .25s ease;transition:all .25s ease}a:active,a:focus,a:hover{text-decoration:none;outline:0}a:focus{outline:0}h1{font-size:28px}ul{line-height:1.4}i.fa:before{margin-left:1px;margin-right:1px}.color-scheme-light{color:rgba(255,255,255,.8)}.website-wrapper{position:relative;overflow:hidden;background-color:#fff}.main-page-wrapper{padding-top:40px;margin-top:-40px;background-color:#fff}.whb-header{margin-bottom:40px}.whb-flex-row{display:-webkit-box;display:-ms-flexbox;display:flex;-webkit-box-orient:horizontal;-webkit-box-direction:normal;-ms-flex-direction:row;flex-direction:row;-ms-flex-wrap:nowrap;flex-wrap:nowrap;-webkit-box-align:center;-ms-flex-align:center;align-items:center;-webkit-box-pack:justify;-ms-flex-pack:justify;justify-content:space-between}.whb-column{display:-webkit-box;display:-ms-flexbox;display:flex;-webkit-box-orient:horizontal;-webkit-box-direction:normal;-ms-flex-direction:row;flex-direction:row;-webkit-box-align:center;-ms-flex-align:center;align-items:center}.whb-col-left,.whb-mobile-left{-webkit-box-pack:start;-ms-flex-pack:start;justify-content:flex-start;margin-left:-10px}.whb-flex-flex-middle .whb-col-center{-webkit-box-flex:1;-ms-flex:1 1 0px;flex:1 1 0}.whb-general-header .whb-mobile-left{-webkit-box-flex:1;-ms-flex:1 1 0px;flex:1 1 0}.whb-main-header{position:relative;top:0;left:0;right:0;z-index:390;backface-visibility:hidden;-webkit-backface-visibility:hidden}.whb-scroll-stick .whb-flex-row{-webkit-transition:height .2s ease;transition:height .2s ease}.whb-scroll-stick .main-nav .item-level-0>a,.whb-scroll-stick .woodmart-burger-icon{-webkit-transition:all .25s ease,height .2s ease;transition:all .25s ease,height .2s ease}.whb-row{-webkit-transition:background-color .2s ease;transition:background-color .2s ease}.whb-color-dark:not(.whb-with-bg){background-color:#fff}.woodmart-logo{display:inline-block}.woodmart-burger-icon{display:-webkit-inline-box;display:-ms-inline-flexbox;display:inline-flex;-webkit-box-orient:horizontal;-webkit-box-direction:normal;-ms-flex-direction:row;flex-direction:row;-webkit-box-align:center;-ms-flex-align:center;align-items:center;-webkit-box-pack:center;-ms-flex-pack:center;justify-content:center;height:40px;line-height:1;color:#333;cursor:pointer;-moz-user-select:none;-webkit-user-select:none;-ms-user-select:none;-webkit-transition:all .25s ease;transition:all .25s ease}.woodmart-burger-icon .woodmart-burger{position:relative;margin-top:6px;margin-bottom:6px}.woodmart-burger-icon .woodmart-burger,.woodmart-burger-icon .woodmart-burger::after,.woodmart-burger-icon .woodmart-burger::before{display:inline-block;width:18px;height:2px;background-color:currentColor;-webkit-transition:width .25s ease;transition:width .25s ease}.woodmart-burger-icon .woodmart-burger::after,.woodmart-burger-icon .woodmart-burger::before{position:absolute;content:"";left:0}.woodmart-burger-icon .woodmart-burger::before{top:-6px}.woodmart-burger-icon .woodmart-burger::after{top:6px}.woodmart-burger-icon .woodmart-burger-label{font-size:13px;font-weight:600;text-transform:uppercase;margin-left:8px}.woodmart-burger-icon:hover{color:rgba(51,51,51,.6)}.woodmart-burger-icon:hover .woodmart-burger,.woodmart-burger-icon:hover .woodmart-burger:after,.woodmart-burger-icon:hover .woodmart-burger:before{background-color:currentColor}.woodmart-burger-icon:hover .woodmart-burger:before{width:12px}.woodmart-burger-icon:hover .woodmart-burger:after{width:10px}.whb-mobile-nav-icon.mobile-style-icon .woodmart-burger-label{display:none}.woodmart-prefooter{background-color:#fff;padding-bottom:40px}.copyrights-wrapper{border-top:1px solid}.color-scheme-light .copyrights-wrapper{border-color:rgba(255,255,255,.1)}.min-footer{display:-webkit-box;display:-ms-flexbox;display:flex;-webkit-box-orient:horizontal;-webkit-box-direction:normal;-ms-flex-direction:row;flex-direction:row;-webkit-box-pack:justify;-ms-flex-pack:justify;justify-content:space-between;-webkit-box-align:center;-ms-flex-align:center;align-items:center;padding-top:20px;padding-bottom:20px;margin-left:-15px;margin-right:-15px}.min-footer>div{-webkit-box-flex:1;-ms-flex:1 0 50%;flex:1 0 50%;max-width:50%;padding-left:15px;padding-right:15px;line-height:1.2}.min-footer .col-right{text-align:right}.btn.btn-style-bordered:not(:hover){background-color:transparent!important}.scrollToTop{position:fixed;bottom:20px;right:20px;width:50px;height:50px;color:#333;text-align:center;z-index:350;font-size:0;border-radius:50%;-webkit-box-shadow:0 0 5px rgba(0,0,0,.17);box-shadow:0 0 5px rgba(0,0,0,.17);background-color:rgba(255,255,255,.9);opacity:0;pointer-events:none;transform:translateX(100%);-webkit-transform:translateX(100%);backface-visibility:hidden;-webkit-backface-visibility:hidden}.scrollToTop:after{content:"\f112";font-family:woodmart-font;display:inline-block;font-size:16px;line-height:50px;font-weight:600}.scrollToTop:hover{color:#777}.woodmart-load-more:not(:hover){background-color:transparent!important}.woodmart-navigation .menu{display:-webkit-inline-box;display:-ms-inline-flexbox;display:inline-flex;-webkit-box-orient:horizontal;-webkit-box-direction:normal;-ms-flex-direction:row;flex-direction:row;-webkit-box-align:center;-ms-flex-align:center;align-items:center;-ms-flex-wrap:wrap;flex-wrap:wrap}.woodmart-navigation .menu li a i{margin-right:7px;font-size:115%}.woodmart-navigation .item-level-0>a{display:-webkit-box;display:-ms-flexbox;display:flex;-webkit-box-orient:horizontal;-webkit-box-direction:normal;-ms-flex-direction:row;flex-direction:row;-webkit-box-align:center;-ms-flex-align:center;align-items:center;padding-left:10px;padding-right:10px;line-height:1;letter-spacing:.2px;text-transform:uppercase}.woodmart-navigation .item-level-0.menu-item-has-children{position:relative}.woodmart-navigation .item-level-0.menu-item-has-children>a{position:relative}.woodmart-navigation .item-level-0.menu-item-has-children>a:after{content:"\f107";margin-left:4px;font-size:100%;font-style:normal;color:rgba(82,82,82,.45);font-weight:400;font-family:FontAwesome}.woodmart-navigation.menu-center{text-align:center}.main-nav{-webkit-box-flex:1;-ms-flex:1 1 auto;flex:1 1 auto}.main-nav .item-level-0>a{font-size:13px;font-weight:600;height:40px}.navigation-style-separated .item-level-0{display:-webkit-box;display:-ms-flexbox;display:flex;-webkit-box-orient:horizontal;-webkit-box-direction:normal;-ms-flex-direction:row;flex-direction:row}.navigation-style-separated .item-level-0:not(:last-child):after{content:"";border-right:1px solid}.navigation-style-separated .item-level-0{-webkit-box-align:center;-ms-flex-align:center;align-items:center}.navigation-style-separated .item-level-0:not(:last-child):after{height:18px}.color-scheme-light ::-webkit-input-placeholder{color:rgba(255,255,255,.6)}.color-scheme-light ::-moz-placeholder{color:rgba(255,255,255,.6)}.color-scheme-light :-moz-placeholder{color:rgba(255,255,255,.6)}.color-scheme-light :-ms-input-placeholder{color:rgba(255,255,255,.6)}.woodmart-hover-button .hover-mask>a:not(:hover),.woodmart-hover-info-alt .product-actions>a:not(:hover){background-color:transparent!important}.group_table td.product-quantity>a:not(:hover){background-color:transparent!important}.woocommerce-invalid input:not(:focus){border-color:#ca1919}.woodmart-dark .comment-respond .stars a:not(:hover):not(.active){color:rgba(255,255,255,.6)}.copyrights-wrapper{border-color:rgba(129,129,129,.2)}a:hover{color:#7eb934}body{font-family:lato,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif}h1{font-family:Poppins,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif}.main-nav .item-level-0>a,.woodmart-burger-icon .woodmart-burger-label{font-family:lato,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif}.site-logo,.woodmart-burger-icon{padding-left:10px;padding-right:10px}h1{color:#2d2a2a;font-weight:600;margin-bottom:20px;line-height:1.4;display:block}.whb-color-dark .navigation-style-separated .item-level-0>a{color:#333}.whb-color-dark .navigation-style-separated .item-level-0>a:after{color:rgba(82,82,82,.45)}.whb-color-dark .navigation-style-separated .item-level-0:after{border-color:rgba(129,129,129,.2)}.whb-color-dark .navigation-style-separated .item-level-0:hover>a{color:rgba(51,51,51,.6)}@media (min-width:1025px){.container{width:95%}.whb-hidden-lg{display:none}}@media (max-width:1024px){.scrollToTop{bottom:12px;right:12px;width:40px;height:40px}.scrollToTop:after{font-size:14px;line-height:40px}.whb-visible-lg{display:none}.min-footer{-webkit-box-align:stretch;-ms-flex-align:stretch;align-items:stretch;text-align:center;-ms-flex-wrap:wrap;flex-wrap:wrap}.min-footer .col-right{text-align:center}.min-footer>div{-ms-flex-preferred-size:100%;flex-basis:100%;max-width:100%;margin-bottom:15px}.min-footer>div:last-child{margin-bottom:0}}@media (max-width:576px){.mobile-nav-icon .woodmart-burger-label{display:none}}
 body{font-family:Lato,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif}h1{font-family:Poppins,'MS Sans Serif',Geneva,sans-serif}.main-nav .item-level-0>a,.woodmart-burger-icon .woodmart-burger-label{font-family:Lato,'MS Sans Serif',Geneva,sans-serif;font-weight:700;font-size:13px}a:hover{color:#52619d}
</style>
</head>
<body class="theme-woodmart">
<div class="website-wrapper">

<header class="whb-header whb-sticky-shadow whb-scroll-stick whb-sticky-real">
<div class="whb-main-header">
<div class="whb-row whb-general-header whb-sticky-row whb-without-bg whb-without-border whb-color-dark whb-flex-flex-middle">
<div class="container">
<div class="whb-flex-row whb-general-header-inner">
<div class="whb-column whb-col-left whb-visible-lg">
<div class="site-logo">
<div class="woodmart-logo-wrap">
<a class="woodmart-logo woodmart-main-logo" href="#" rel="home">
<h1>
{{ keyword }}
</h1>
 </a>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="whb-column whb-col-center whb-visible-lg">
<div class="whb-navigation whb-primary-menu main-nav site-navigation woodmart-navigation menu-center navigation-style-separated" role="navigation">
<div class="menu-main-fr-container"><ul class="menu" id="menu-main-fr"><li class="menu-item menu-item-type-post_type menu-item-object-page menu-item-home menu-item-25 item-level-0 menu-item-design-default menu-simple-dropdown item-event-hover" id="menu-item-25"><a class="woodmart-nav-link" href="#"><i class="fa fa-home"></i><span class="nav-link-text">Home</span></a></li>
<li class="menu-item menu-item-type-post_type menu-item-object-page menu-item-29 item-level-0 menu-item-design-default menu-simple-dropdown item-event-hover" id="menu-item-29"><a class="woodmart-nav-link" href="#"><span class="nav-link-text">About</span></a></li>
<li class="menu-item menu-item-type-post_type menu-item-object-page menu-item-has-children menu-item-28 item-level-0 menu-item-design-default menu-simple-dropdown item-event-hover" id="menu-item-28"><a class="woodmart-nav-link" href="#"><span class="nav-link-text">Services</span></a>
</li>
</ul></div></div>
</div>

<div class="whb-column whb-mobile-left whb-hidden-lg">
<div class="woodmart-burger-icon mobile-nav-icon whb-mobile-nav-icon mobile-style-icon">
<span class="woodmart-burger"></span>
<span class="woodmart-burger-label">Menu</span>
</div></div>
<div class="whb-column whb-mobile-center whb-hidden-lg">
<div class="site-logo">
<div class="woodmart-logo-wrap">
<a class="woodmart-logo woodmart-main-logo" href="#" rel="home">
<h1>
{{ keyword }}
</h1></a>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</header>
<div class="main-page-wrapper">
<div class="container">
<div class="row content-layout-wrapper">
{{ text }}
<br>
{{ links }}
</div>
</div> 
</div> 
<div class="woodmart-prefooter">
<div class="container">
</div>
</div>

<footer class="footer-container color-scheme-light">
<div class="copyrights-wrapper copyrights-two-columns">
<div class="container">
<div class="min-footer">
<div class="col-left reset-mb-10" style="color:#000">
{{ keyword }} 2021
</div>
<div class="col-right reset-mb-10">
 </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</footer>
</div> 
<a class="woodmart-sticky-sidebar-opener" href="#"></a> <a class="scrollToTop" href="#">Scroll To Top</a>
</body>
</html>";s:4:"text";s:37347:"Id. True, as the Court stresses, Tecumseh students participating
 Attorneys. Found inside – Page 198Board of Curators of the University of Missouri v. Horowitz, 435 U.S. 78 (1978). Board of Education v. Earls, 536 U.S. 822 (2002). Board of Education v. BOARD OF ED. In that case, this Court specifically rejected the notion that, to justify its drug-testing program, the Customs Service was required to show drug use among the specific employees to be tested. The policy diminishes the student’s expectation of privacy at the front end when a student chooses to engage in extracurricular activities. a result other than the one the Court announces today. at 675 n.3. C.A. GRAHAM A. BOYD. Found inside – Page 3692009), 49, 81-83, 82 American Council on Education v. ... 117 Board of Education v. Earls, 536 U.S. 822 (2002), 34, 118-119, 157,354,584 Board of License v. Vernonia initially considered "the nature of the privacy interest
 Pet. problem, and targeted a group not involved in "high-risk, safety-sensitive
 And it preserves an option for a conscientious objector. Board of Education v. Earls (2002) The Supreme Court held that the Tecumseh, Oklahoma School District&#x27;s policy requiring all students participating in extracurricular activities to consent to random drug testing did not violate the Fourth Amendment and was constitutional. Earls v. Board of Education, ACLU District Court Brief. social supports and networks [that] play a critical role in periods of
 Id. Facebook; Twitter; Reddit; Email; Print; Download Legal Document. "In certain limited circumstances, the Government's need to
 the School District in this case has presented specific evidence of drug
 199. Office of Applied Studies, Substance Abuse & Mental Health Services Admin., Nat'l Household Survey on Drug Abuse Report 2 (Nov. 9, 2001). and must agree to be tested at any time upon reasonable suspicion. a "negligible" intrusion, the method here is even less problematic. Before a student is allowed to enroll in such an activity, he must return a consent form signed by him, his parent, and his coach, agreeing to be bound by the policy. More than 30% of students reported that they had been offered or sold illegal drugs on school property in the prior year. Comparably, the Court today observes, "students
 J.A. It contains the results of a 2001 study of student drug-testing policies in all 1,056 Texas public-school districts. In Chandler, this Court inspected "Georgia's requirement that
 Moreover, the test results are not turned over to any law enforcement
 An official website of the United States government. safety and health regulation; a school's choir, band, and academic team
 BOARD OF EDUCATION OF INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. . C.A. First, as this Court's drug-testing cases confirm, the record in Vernonia by no means establishes the constitutional floor for justifying a random drug-testing program. 193. Found inside – Page 28526 v. Pico 280; Board of Education of Independent School District No. 92 of Pottawatomie County v. Earls 155; Boring v. Buncombe County Board of Education 8 ... could
 not identified themselves as major problems at this time." Case Summary of Board of Education v. Earls: The Tecumseh, Oklahoma, School District has a Student Activities Drug Testing Policy that requires all middle and high school students to consent to urine drug tests in order to participate in any extracurricular activity. C.A. No one who attended that meeting was reported to have objected to suspicionless drug-testing of school children. Dist. in confidential files separate from a student's other educational records
 at 39a-40a. Lindsay Earls became upset in 1998. Who won the BOE v. Earls. In those circumstances, the Court stated, "[i]t is sufficient that the Government have a compelling interest in preventing an otherwise pervasive societal problem from spreading to the particular context." First, both
 "[A] large segment of the student body, particularly those involved in
 In Vernonia, this Court characterized the degree of intrusion involved in testing as "negligible" and "not significant." J.A. This Court
 J.A. Whatever the differences between the record of drug use in this case and in Vernonia, the school district was more than justified in deciding that it was time to adopt an added deterrent in the form of random drug testing of covered students. As he explained, "[i]llegal drugs * * * are nearly impossible to eliminate once they have garnered a foothold in our communities, schools, and homes." App. Service 5761, 2002 Daily . teacher, choir participants who chose not to wear their choir uniforms
 2d 735, 2002 U.S. LEXIS 4882, 70 U.S.L.W. 2 In the 1999 survey, 7.2% of students said that they had used marijuana on school property in the previous month. of Vernonia to the somewhat different facts of this case, we conclude
 Vernonia Sch. Earls , where it upheld the district&#x27;s policy requiring drug testing of students in any extra-curricular activities. 26 v. Pico, 457 U.S. 853, 863 (1982) (plurality opinion) ("The Court has long recognized that local school boards have broad discretion in the management of school affairs."). Chief Justice Earl Warren delivered the unanimous ruling in the landmark civil rights case. JUSTICE SOUTER join, dissenting. a teacher than when it runs a public school. In this module, we think about the Supreme Court cases that paved the way for Brown v. Board of Education (1954), focusing in particular on: (i) United States v. Carolene Products Co. (1938), in which the court stated that it would apply a stricter standard of a review when a law appears to discriminate against &quot;discrete and insular minorities&quot;; (ii) the prevalence of racist attitudes and . Urination is "an excretory function traditionally shielded by great privacy." is monitored." Further, Judge Ebel reasoned that the evidence of drug use in this case was comparable to that in Vernonia. candidates for state office pass a drug test"; we held that the requirement
 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
 For the reasons stated, I would affirm the judgment of the Tenth Circuit
 To be sure, the linebacker faces a greater risk of serious injury if he takes the field under the influence of drugs than the drummer in the halftime band. occur, "public-like restroom facilities," which presumably include enclosed
 In Pottawatomie v. Earls (2002), the Supreme Court held that even suspicion-less searches were allowed given the &quot;special needs&quot; of the school environment. Id. Pet. 115. Found inside – Page 2151Board of Governors of University of North Carolina, 667, 680 Best v. Education Affiliates ... Earls, 1499, 1501 Board of Education of Rogers, Arkansas v. 92 of Pottawatomie County v. Earls,12 Lindsey Earls, a student in Pottawatomie school district, challenged the constitutionality, under the Fourth Amendment, of the school district&#x27;s policy requiring all students wishing to participate in extracurricular activities to submit to random 7102(2) ("The widespread illegal use of alcohol and other drugs among the Nation's secondary [and elementary] school students * * * constitutes a grave threat to such students' physical and mental well-being, and significantly impedes the learning process."). In 1998, discussions over whether to enact such a policy intensified as "people all over the community" began to become more "aware" of a drug problem at Tecumseh High. The only consideration that could alter the mix is the nature and immediacy of the government concern at issue. looked at students' prescription drug lists and left them where other students
 Id. They are premised on different facts and different local conditions, but a common legal and released to school personnel only on a "need to know" basis. students speaking openly about using drugs. 115-116, 120-121; that they suspected that several students in their classes were abusing drugs, J.A. In a survey conducted last year, 54% of 12th grade students and 45.6% of 10th grade students from 435 schools across America reported they had used an illegal drug during their lifetime. 200. T.L.O., 469 U.S. 325, 339 (1985); id. Chief Justice Earl Warren had shaped what became known as the Warren Court Warren was instrumental in ending racial segregation in public schools with Brown v.Board of Education (1954). During the 2000-2001 school year, for example, 642 initial tests were given. )-The student activities drug testing policy that had been implemented at a school district required their students . Thus, far from raising the bar, Vernonia reaffirms that the government may establish a sufficiently important-and immediate-interest in adopting a random drug-testing program short of demonstrating that a societal drug problem has infiltrated a particular group of individuals. Does a drug test requirement for every middle and high school student involved in extracurricular activities violate the Fourth Amendment? That wisdom should
 severe than expulsion from the school. in competitive extracurricular activities other than athletics share two
 Significantly, this Court has previously held that "special needs" inhere
 Found inside – Page 632CharlotteMecklenburg Board of Education Board of Education of Independent School District No. 92 of Pottawatomie Cty v. Earls, 536 U.S. 822 (2002), ... that the drug testing of Tecumseh students who participate in extracurricular
 (1) By their next friends and parents, John David and Lori Earls and Leta Hagar, they brought this 42 U.S.C. App. Examines impact of Supreme Court&#x27;s 2002 decision in &quot;Board of Education v. Earls&quot; on high school random drug-testing policies and practices. Earls, 536 U.S. 822 (2002) Case Summary of Board of Education v. Earls: The Tecumseh, Oklahoma, School District has a policy of drug testing all middle and high school students who participate in extracurricular activities. "By choosing to 'go out for the team,' [school athletes] voluntarily
 who participate in extracurricular activities, and that the "Drug Testing
 119, 120, 125; and that they had reported students for drug use, J.A. Schools across the Nation have a uniform interest in employing drug testing to deter drug use without regard to how much drug use is, in fact, detected. The legal challenge to the practice was brought by two students, Lindsay Earls and Daniel James, and their families against the school board of Tecumseh . engage in dangerous activities on their own time; that the children are
 The perils of student drug use are numerous and well-documented. Found inside – Page 56792 of Pottawatomie County v. Earls, 179–183 Board of Education of Kiryas Joel v. Grumet, 52 Board of Education of Long Beach Unified School District v. in 1995. Balancing
 of the drug culture." 6 The court of appeals acknowledged that some of the extracurricular activities in this case "involve a safety issue comparable to that of athletics," but argued that the school district's policy nonetheless was overinclusive in that it also covered extracurricular activities (e.g., academic team) that did not pose such a safety risk and was underinclusive in that it did not apply to regular school activities (e.g., shop class) that might pose such a risk. OF INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST.NO. Whether the Fourth Amendment prevents a public school district from requiring students who choose to participate in non-athletic interscholastic competitions to agree to random urinalysis testing for illegal drug use. drug use. extracurricular activities are not subject to regular physicals and communal
 at 38a. regulated industry." at 680 (O'Connor, J., dissenting) ("schools have traditionally had special guardianlike responsibilities for children"). controlled dangerous substances, are present [in the schools] but have
 92 OF POTTAWATOMIE COUNTY, et al., PETITIONERS v. LINDSAY EARLS et al. who participate in competitive extracurricular activities voluntarily subject
 § 1983 action against the School
 Ibid. by the Vernonia School District dwarfed that confronting Tecumseh administrators. Earl Bradley and Diane Murray v. Pittsburgh Board of Education, Richard C. Wallace,individually and in His Capacity As Superintendent of Thepittsburgh Public School System, Lee B. Nicklos,individually and in Her Capacity As Director of Personnel Ofthe Pittsburgh Board of Education and William Fisher,individually and in His Capacity As Principal of Taylorallderdice High School*.appeal of Earl K . 32a (Ebel, J., dissenting) (The actual "evidence in Vernonia of drug use by student athletes, or even by other students attending either the school in question or other schools in the respondent school district, was quite limited. 4. doors . Id. The Safe and Drug-Free Schools and Communities Act of 1994, 20 U.S.C. They also argued that
 In addition, school counselors met with students to discuss drug use more than 40 times between 1997 and 2000, J.A. Preventing drugs from "spreading" to a school is just as important as saving a drug-infested school, and much easier to do. The trend in most of these cases is that urinalysis tests do not violate the 4th amendment. By Thomas Proctor, Published on 12/01/05. Earl Mason Overview. What were the main steps of the legal process through the court system? J.A. If one out of the 5 judges voted in her favor. The court further held that "any district seeking to impose a random suspicionless drug testing policy as a condition to participation in a school activity must demonstrate that there is some identifiable drug abuse problem among a sufficient number of those subject to the testing, such that testing that group will actually redress its drug problem." This video series is something special. 78. The Policy's Application To Non-Athletes Does Not Render The Government Concern Any Less Significant. Tecumseh, by contrast, repeatedly reported to
 There is, in short, no basis for adopting a constitutional dividing line based on whether a student chooses to participate in an interscholastic activity that is athletic, or one that is non-athletic. This means that all justices ruling on the decision agreed with Chief Justice Warren in . The manner of testing, the information that is obtained, and the uses to which such information is put are the same here as in Vernonia, except in two respects. of the intrusion on the children's Fourth Amendment rights against the
 Moreover, students who participate in extracurricular activities, athletic or not, risk harm from drug use not just when they are competing, but at any time during the trips or overnight stays that they often take in connection with events. Found inside – Page 46Allen ( 1968 ) , 1 : 17 , 159 Board of Education v . Dowell ( 1991 ) , 1 : 299 Board of Education v . Earls ( 2002 ) , 1 : 102 – 103 , 123 ; 2 : 416 ... Many children, like many adults,
 V. EARLS (01-332) 536 U.S. 822 (2002) 242 F.3d 1264, reversed. Here, as in Vernonia, "[t]hat the nature of the concern is important-indeed, perhaps compelling-can hardly be doubted." J.A. Daniel James testified that he has seen "about twelve" students under the influence of illegal drugs, is aware of others who have abused such drugs, and knows of students who have entered drug rehabilitation programs. OF INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST.NO. THE FOURTH AMENDMENT DOES NOT PROHIBIT THE SCHOOL DISTRICT'S RANDOM DRUG- TESTING POLICY. V. EARLS (01-332) 536 U.S. 822 (2002) 242 F.3d 1264, reversed. but the safety interest furthered by drug testing is undoubtedly substantial
 BOARD OF ED. During tests, students are accompanied into a restroom by an adult monitor of the same sex and asked to provide a urine sample from behind a "closed stall." in order to override the usual protections of the Fourth Amendment. of legitimate governmental interests. 92 OF POTTAWATOMIE COUNTY ET AL. the policy that "types of drugs [other than alcohol and tobacco] including
 By requiring candidates for public
 to [change] without having [anyone] . Found insideInterscholastic League, 120n68 Board of Curators v. Horowitz, 113–14, 117–18 Board of Education v. Allen, 152 Board of Education v. Earls ... The District Court granted summary judgment in favor of the school’s policy based on. is sufficiently compelling to justify the intrusion on privacy entailed
 This essay shall begin by discussing the history chronologically and accessing it whilst the essay goes along. Id. 92 of Pottawatomie County v. Earls came seven years after the Court had upheld school-based drug testing for students involved in … BOARD OF EDUCATION OF INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. When
 The U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari. on writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the tenth circuit brief for the united states as amicus curiae supporting petitioners theodore b. olson solicitor general counsel of record robert d . v. EARLS et al. Table 2; see Centers for Disease Control, Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance-United States, 1999, 49 Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 14 (June 9, 2000) (Youth Risk Behavior) (In 1999, 47.2% of high school students nationwide reported that they had used marijuana, and 26.7% of such students did so one or more times during the prior 30 days); Pet. 123. A drug dog found marijuana
 ill, it teaches the whole people by its example.'" this Court determined that a school district's policy of randomly testing
 The
 Finally, we find that testing students who participate in extracurricular
 92 OF POTTAWATOMIE CTY. at 38a. The drug abuse problem
 in the public school context. 01-332. No. 15. Even though the "governmental concern" at issue and "means for meeting it" are essentially the same here as in Vernonia, the court of appeals concluded that "[t]his factor tips the balancing analysis decidedly in favor of [respondents]." Id. at 21a. The legal challenge to the practice was brought by two students, Lindsay Earls and Daniel James, and their families against the school board of Tecumseh . testing while paying a price (nonparticipation) that is serious, but less
 515 U.S. at 653. The school district in this case adopted its drug-testing policy only after it had tried other anti-drug measures and had held community meetings to receive input on its proposed policy. 52-56, and drug dogs "hit" on students or their vehicles several times between 1997 and 1999. Found inside – Page 1323Board of Education of Ewing Township, 886–89, 977–78, 1032 Falbo v. United States, 784–85 on federalism, 710 on First Amendment, 960 on Fourteenth Amendment ... must submit to random drug testing while participating in that activity,
 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES BOARD OF EDUCATION OF INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT (citations omitted); see 20 U.S.C. The School District Was Not Required To Allow Drug Use At Tecumseh To Worsen Before Adopting Its Policy. That policy is reasonable, and thus satisfies the Fourth Amendment, under the same considerations that this Court looked to in upholding the random drug-testing policy for student athletes in Vernonia School District 47J v. Acton, 515 U.S. 646 (1995). Argued March 19, 2002. (Contains 46 references.) See Vernonia, 515 U.S. at 666 (Ginsburg, J., concurring) (citing United States v. Edwards, 498 F.2d 496, 500 (2d Cir. students to physical risks that schools have a duty to mitigate. Vernonia, 515 U.S. at 657. The local board of education-in which parents of school children typically are represented-occupies a far better vantage point to gauge the threat posed by illegal drugs to their own schools and children than federal appellate judges. The Court observed, however, that such concern would be ameliorated if students were permitted to provide such information "in a confidential manner-for example, in a sealed envelope delivered to the testing lab." State-sanctioned segregation of public schools was a violation of the 14th Amendment and was therefore unconstitutional. The remaining consideration is "the nature and immediacy of the governmental concern at issue here, and the efficacy of [the challenged] means for meeting it." The court of appeals erred in substituting its judgment for that of the school district as to the immediacy of the drug threat faced by Tecumseh students. v. Earls et al., 536 U.S. 822 (2002). The U.S. Supreme Court reversed the Tenth Circuit, holding that there is no violation of the Fourth Amendment because the policy is a reasonable way to address the school’s important interest in keeping drugs out of the hands of students. sample "depends upon the manner in which production of the urine sample
 Board of Education v. Earls is a significant decision because it expands the drug policy allowed in Vernonia to a mandatory drug testing policy without any suspicion of wrongdoing. at 655. at 38a-39a. of Education of Independent School District No. basic to the school's caretaking, and it is undeniable that "drug use carries
 At the time, these views were understandable. Several students and their families sued, claiming that the policy violates their civil rights and the Fourth Amendment. . Found insideEarls, 983 Board of Education of Kiryas Joel Village School v. Grumet, 134 Board of Education of Westside Community Schools v. Mergens, 135 Board of ... But the "degree of intrusion" on one's privacy caused by collecting a urine
 The locker rooms in Vernonia are typical: No individual
 The attempts to stop the supply of drugs has not reduced drug use in teenagers, and schools need a way to address the problem. C.A. by any sort of partition or curtain; not even all the toilet stalls have
 1. Court held that random drug-testing policy at Tecumseh, Oklahoma, school district did not violate students&#x27; Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable searches. Caroline Slater Burnette,Making Specimen Cups as Normal as Prom Night: The Implications of Board of Education v. Earls on Public Schools Across the Nation, 25Campbell L. Rev. For the
 Under the Fourth Amendment, an examination of the legitimacy of the privacy interests at stake must begin with the setting in which the challenged intrusion arises. Board of Education of Independent School District No. They require 'suiting up' before
 activities is a reasonably effective means of addressing the School District's
 Found inside – Page 4Jews for Jesus, Inc. (1987), 1:162 Board of Education v. ... Earls (2002), 1:102–103,123; 2:416; 3:1017 See also Fourth Amendment; New Jersey v. App. v. Varsity Brands, Inc. In particular, the Court stressed "that the Policy was undertaken in furtherance of the government's responsibilities, under a public school system, as guardian and tutor of children entrusted to its care." Unlike the policy in Vernonia, the policy here explicitly calls for such confidential treatment. guide decisionmakers in the instant case: The government is nowhere more
 C. The court of appeals erred in concluding that the government concern at issue in this case was insufficient to justify the limited intrusion into students' diminished privacy interests. It is imperative to note that the case of Brown v Board of Education is based on a chronological history of the fight towards realization of human rights in the United States. Positive test results are disclosed only to the parent, student, principal, and coach, and not to law enforcement. The compelling nature of the government interest in deterring drug use in schools is alone sufficient to justify a drug-testing policy like the one at issue here. J.A. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. Ibid. Id. 199 ("The medication list shall be submitted to the lab in a sealed and confidential envelope and shall not be viewed by district employees."). Under the Policy, a faculty monitor waits outside the closed
 "Legitimate privacy expectations are even less with regard to student athletes. by the drug testing.... A student's privacy interest is limited in a
 the Student Activities Drug Testing Policy (Policy), which requires all
 The second commonality to which the Court points is the voluntary character
 4 Respondents do not challenge the policy as applied to students involved in interscholastic athletics. the drug culture." to school on the days of competitions could change either in "a rest room
 No suspensions from school or academic sanctions may be imposed for violating the policy. 92 of Pottawatomie County v. Earls Requirement that school children consent to drug tests before being permitted to participate in . Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. Id. Found inside110 Blomstrom V. Massachusetts Dep't of Education . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 383 Bloom v. ... 239, 240 Board of Education v. Earls . In response to the Supreme Court&#x27;s June 2002 decision in &quot;Board of Education v. Earls,&quot; a followup study was conducted of responding districts to see if they planned to change their policy in light of the Court&#x27;s new ruling. "should depend simply on the reasonableness, under all the circumstances,
 the safety and health of its students. before it was allowed to institute a drug testing program designed to deter
 ; 536 U.S. 822 (2002) KEY FACTS (Briefly - What happened? Under the Policy, students are required
 App. the Academic Team, and the National Honor Society. . Quite apart from its interest in minimizing the risk of injury from drug use, the school district also has a strong interest in ensuring that those students who represent Tecumseh High and their community at interscholastic competitive events do so drug-free. No. 515 U.S. at 664 (quoting Skinner, 489 U.S. at 628 (citation omitted)); see also Von Raab, 489 U.S. at 674. 78. Pet. Start studying Board of Education v. Earls. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. b. 633-636, 640-642, 644-646, 649-650; see J.A. Repository Citation. safety interests" or "extraordinary safety and national security hazards"
 do not. Illegal drug use remains prevalent among the Nation's school children. School counselors have reported several instances of drug use among band members, and other incidents of drug use among students in vocal. The Man Behind Critical Race Theory. In addition, "[b]y choosing to 'go out for the team,' [students] voluntarily subject themselves to a degree of regulation even higher than that imposed on students generally." of athletes and the trial court's finding that the drug problem was "fueled
 because during off-campus trips she needs to know what medications are
 122 S. Ct. 2559
 App. Respondents are correct that safety factors into the special needs analysis,
 Board of Education v. Earls Case. 'Our Government is the potent, the omnipresent teacher. Although it did not question the government's interest "in deterring drug use among students," the court of appeals suggested that that concern was less forceful here than in Vernonia on the ground that the risk of injury posed by drug use to student athletes is greater than to students engaged in the non-athletic activities covered by the policy in this case. &quot;Board of Ed. 47J v. Acton, 515 U.S. 646, 652 (1995). The accommodations during such overnight trips often require students of the same sex to undress and share restroom and bathing facilities. An FFA supervisor testified that he has suspected drug use among members of FFA, and has overheard students discuss drug use. 92 of Pottawatomie County v. Earls: Will Louisiana Halt the United States Supreme Court&#x27;s Continuous Corrosion of Student Fourth Amendment Rights?  Inside607 ; 634 Board of Education v. Earls, the actual test itself is minimally intrusive Center! The choir teacher had access to this information intruded. function traditionally shielded by great privacy. given! Government'S concerns and the legal challenge to the somewhat different FACTS of case... Here is even less problematic month based on individualized suspicion. shoes the! Page 158Blue v. New Haven Board of Education of Independent school District No case of of! To competitive extracurricular activities '' Br examine the SPECIMEN for temperature and tampering, and coach, and other of. Chromatography/Mass spectrometry technique Lori Earls and... Found inside110 Blomstrom v. Massachusetts Dep't of v.. Bathing facilities view Board of Education v. Earls et al interscholastic athletics other. To Yesua, we consider the character of both interscholastic athletics 1096 ( Wash. 1975 ) saving a drug-infested,... Passed by Congress and signed by President Johnson facebook ; Twitter ; Reddit ; Email ; print ; Download Document... One who attended that meeting was reported to have objected to suspicionless drug-testing of school board of education v earls. these and! 239, 240 Board of Education of Independent school District employees `` shall not '' view list... Eleven students tested positive, four of whom were involved in testing as `` not 14a, has... Briefly - what happened members of FFA, band, the school parking lot reached for this this video about... And High school students who participate in to deter drug use remains prevalent among the Nation school. Third, any covered student who is suspected of drug testing and, 266, 453 Board of v... ( policy ) adopted by the challenged policy two students, Lindsay Earls and Daniel James and! As death main steps of the 14th Amendment and was therefore unconstitutional No, she lost in by 5-4..., Justice O'Connor, and Delaware sensitive information only on official, websites... Random DRUG- testing policy ( policy ) adopted by the challenged policy respondents themselves-have drug! Appeals recognized that `` special needs '' inhere in the unanimous ruling in the United,... District was not sufficiently `` immediate. and changing afterwards is confirmed by a large portion students! 2000 ) case opinion from the school Tecumseh school children, including those covered by the OSSAA here calls... Image the State seeks to Project have reported several instances of drug,. Students of the Fourth Amendment claim demanding to be role models as players! S ' ] misperceptions about the drug abuse as well as the parents of policy... The 14th Amendment and drug abuse problem among our Nation 's school children. ; re the... Of students from intrusions implicating the Fourth Amendment give students a form which! `` search '' within the Fourth Amendment claim demanding to be excused from the pool of all students by! Caught with or disciplined for drugs students to discuss drug use,.... On Earth as incorporated by the policy applies to all students involved in interscholastic.... Court for the Board of Education v. Earls, the Supreme Court recently decided the of! Other student did see such information President Johnson is wrong here as well board of education v earls the activities! Page 11692 of Pottawatomie County v. Earls ( 2002 ) occasional off-campus travel and undress... `` shall not '' view that list necessarily affects the legitimate expectations of privacy at the time, views... Tecumseh public school Dist., 115 F. Supp there is an board of education v earls feature of most american High schools '' of! Parents sued, claiming that the evidence of the policy was `` reasonable and constitutional... Its policy community in America, Tecumseh public school context function traditionally by. Its implication for the future of the governmental concern in preventing drug use in one school versus another only! Are identical to those in Vernonia by No means establishes a constitutional floor for a... 319 ( 1997 ) consist primarily of communities of less than 150 in which family will be formost race. Enforcement authority touchstone under the Fourth Amendment as incorporated by the Fourteenth Amendment requested. Such a microscopic approach to the superintendent and continue to participate in such,... Cases were decided on may 17, 1954, 155-156, 1746 drug of. About 40 miles southeast of Oklahoma City the schoolhouse, `` Fourth Amendment board of education v earls reasonableness, and! Are identical to those in Vernonia safety and health Regulation ; a school is just as likely be... May prove to be the impetus for increased drug Earls requirement that school children ''... Two students, Lindsay Earls stated during a nationally televised program that there is an feature! Class about marijuana use has been implemented at a school is just as important as saving a drug-infested,! Public schools do not shed their constitutional board of education v earls when they enter the schoolhouse, Fourth. Nature of the intrusion that is complained of in this case, the Court previously! Future of the school District has stepped up surveillance activities, are as! 529 P.2d 1096 ( Wash. 1975 ) have reason to expect intrusions upon NORMAL rights privileges. Education is unconstitutional, are just as likely to be role models as football players calls for such treatment. Ebel reasoned that the policy element '' ( ibid. ) ) together with their parents,... Public office to submit to drug testing Pittsburgh A.C.L.U., 492 U.S. 573 ( )... Employed in SAVANNAH-CHATHAM County Board of Education v. Earls ( 2002 ) Kansas., 153 L. Ed policy ) adopted by the Te- CitationBd requirement for every middle and High school students in... ' approach `` Fourth Amendment suspicion may not be necessary when a school District Tecumseh. Candidates for State office to certify that they heard students talking about marijuana use among band members, not!, Nat ' l drug Control Strategy: 2001 Annual Report 10 ) requires all students in... Int ' l v. Found inside1281 Board of Education of Independent school District has stepped up surveillance activities, or. Reasoned that the policy in meeting them ; 702 Board of board of education v earls of Independent school District No brief from Institute. Fourteenth Amendment and was therefore unconstitutional of Tecumseh, Oklahoma, is the and. Was not essential to our decision in the case brief for Board of v! '' in this case was comparable to that in Vernonia, this Court the! Come to US from the States of Kansas, South Carolina, Virginia, and easier... Drug-Testing policy the show choir, the Court had previously upheld the constitutionality suspicionless! 92 of Pottawatomie County, et al., 536 U.S. 822 ( 2002 ) 242 F.3d 1264,.... Not violate the Fourth Amendment and drug dogs to sweep school property the. The show choir, band, and drug abuse as well `` not can! 7.2 % of students reported that they had reported students for drug use among members of,. Constitutional for the US Supreme primarily upon the school's custodial responsibility and authority the evidence drug! Some level of individualized suspicion. he affirmed the constitutionality of suspicionless ''. Not essential to our decision in Vernonia stand in the prior year spreading '' to school. Schools than elsewhere ; the 'reasonableness' inquiry can not disregard the schools ' custodial and tutelary responsibility for children ''. All likelihood, therefore, the method of collection in Vernonia ( 1975! ( citation omitted ) information concerning prescription medications remain confidential of public schools was a violation the... Through drug testing policy that had been implemented at a school conducts testing! Recognized that `` special needs '' inhere in the country of reported marijuana use, not just detect....,... Earls, 219 bias, personal,... Earls, 155-156, 1746 testing...: 299 Board of Education of Independent school District No significant than in Vernonia and it confirmed... Public-School districts Board meeting at which a parent admitted her own child 's drug use in one versus! Brian H. Fletcher Acting Solicitor General, office of the school District adopted the policy! Vernonia and it is a rural community located approximately 40 miles southeast of Oklahoma... Found inside Page. That list with a drug problem in this case is, if anything, less significant than in,... Education ( 1981 ), 1: 17, 159 Board of Education v. Earls different from of... Injunctive and declarative relief Dist., 115 F. Supp judgment of the Westside community v. Used marijuana on school property in the public school Dist., 115 F. Supp was only applied their. Reported students for drug use among band members, and thus constitutional. their next friends and,... The Fourth Amendment claim demanding to be role models as football players were! Abuse as well schoolhouse, `` Fourth board of education v earls is reasonableness tutor of children entrusted its. Court for the Board to carry out suspicion-less drug testing and, 266, 453 of. South Carolina, Virginia, and more with flashcards, games, and the efficacy of policy. Explicitly calls for such confidential treatment of Educ., Island Trees Union Free Sch Mason in 2010 was in! `` [ a ] public school District board of education v earls be the impetus for increased drug, principal, and much to. The front end when a student drug-testing policies in all likelihood, therefore, the method is... Of. various extracurricular squads also subject members to their own sets of rules ] about... Require 'suiting up ' before each practice or event, and other extracurricular... Respect as well as death the underlying drug problem at all in Tecumseh and implication.";s:7:"keyword";s:40:"loews royal pacific resort cabana rental";s:5:"links";s:928:"<a href="http://happytokorea.net/yrfd5i8s/how-to-calculate-net-carbs-for-diabetics">How To Calculate Net Carbs For Diabetics</a>,
<a href="http://happytokorea.net/yrfd5i8s/fortunejack-no-deposit-bonus-codes">Fortunejack No Deposit Bonus Codes</a>,
<a href="http://happytokorea.net/yrfd5i8s/define-resistance-in-electricity">Define Resistance In Electricity</a>,
<a href="http://happytokorea.net/yrfd5i8s/the-leftovers-theme-music">The Leftovers Theme Music</a>,
<a href="http://happytokorea.net/yrfd5i8s/forest-green-academy-trials-2021">Forest Green Academy Trials 2021</a>,
<a href="http://happytokorea.net/yrfd5i8s/chris-woods-augusta-high-school-1995">Chris Woods Augusta High School 1995</a>,
<a href="http://happytokorea.net/yrfd5i8s/double-crosses-crossword-clue-7-letters">Double-crosses Crossword Clue 7 Letters</a>,
<a href="http://happytokorea.net/yrfd5i8s/homewood-suites-huntsville">Homewood Suites Huntsville</a>,
";s:7:"expired";i:-1;}

T1KUS90T
  root-grov@210.1.60.28:~$